Download Full Movie Memento. Download Full Movie Mirrors 2. Download Full Movie Mummy, The. Download Full Movie Sicilian, The. Download Full Movie StarStruck. Download Full Movie Ted Bundy. Download Full Movie The Expendables. Download Full Movie The Eye. Download Gunless Movie Online Full. Download Hellbreeder Movie Online Full. Dragonfly Download Movie Divx Hd. You have no doubt guaranteed Moore a steady income for the next years, at the very least.
Without a single hope that this will ever be published here, I leave you with my website, where you can view most of these tidbits and MOOoooore. LOL, get it? I think the lengthy post provided by Rob unfortunately proves a trend that bothers me to no end.
All too often someone ie, Rob who is upset about someone else's position in politics and government ie, just about anyone posting on this page simply spends their time belittling whoever disagrees with them, rather than providing constructive criticism and useful dialogue. One such example is the following: "Chris Mccausland writes: u no what i just saw NO, tell us Chris the video of when bush was in florida and the towers were getting hit and he was in a school and some won told him america is under attica and he just sat there wile hundreds of people were dying so this is what i have to say.
I think Chris has every right to be upset with Bush's inaction as the Twin Towers were being bombed. I was as well. No I don't believe that Bush could have called the Justice League for help and I don't think that was Chris's intention.
In that specific situation, I would have appreciated it had Bush politely excused himself from the classroom, telling the kids he had a very important Presidential matter to attend to and that he'd return as soon as he could I'm sure they would be ok with that , and then convened with his advisors and members of the defense community to figure out just wtf was going on.
If the country is under attack, I do think I would like the President to cut-short his PR moment and attend to matters of state. However, Rob simply went for some cheap-shots and contributed actually nothing to this list of posts. Much like his website, which at the moment, does not seem to have any content.
However I am digressing and stooping to the level of childish name-calling that I was previously complaining about. I also don't think that the jibes at the European folks that post on this site were appropriate at all. I am from Detroit and during this past election, several incidents happened in Detroit as well as other cities around the country that simply disgusted me. I heard of folks being harrassed at the polls, that they were told that they would be arrested if they voted.
They were turned away at the door and told that their voter-registration cards were invalid, when it was later proven that they were properly registered to vote. Some people even received bogus telephone calls that day, informing them that their polling location had moved to a different address, and those individuals were given a false address and were obviously very confused.
I don't know if these ridiculous acts were by Democrats or Republicans, and it really doesn't matter. How can we pretend to set-up democracy in these occupied countries when our own electoral system has become such a farce? We have such dismal turn-out for elections. And it can be understandable that someone wouldn't vote, because under the electoral college, it's hard to believe that your vote actually counts. Electoral votes are assigned to a state based on the number of Congressmen that state has.
The reason it doesn't work is that 13 small states with a population of 18 million people have the same number of 'electors' as does California, which has 35 million voters. If you think I'm just whining because Kerry lost and I'm blaming it on the electoral college - I'm not. Bush received That is So obviously, the electoral college is not representative of what the public feels. One last quibble I have is that I find it difficult to believe someone can be President of the country regardless of party when in of the million people who are 18 and older, only million were registered and voted.
That's barely half. So that's 19 million people who were registered, but simply didn't vote! So what's scarier, the way our government behaves, or our apathetic behavior towards that government?
Rather than baselessly attack each other's opinions, I think our time and energy would be best spent making informed decisions, intelligent debates, and attacking a system that fails for both Democrats and Republicans.
I just finished a story based on payback time for wrong decisions taken by Mr. B I think had crashes and all that stuff we knew. In this story not one gun shut, but its a heavey Payback.
Nice ridlle! I just need a sponsor, I know its gonna be a hard thing to accept to sponsor such Marc Perkel Rantz Marc Perkel is the most dangerous mind on the internet.
The state of Israel and its' involvment in the Middle East. Posted by: jdavies at October 21, AM. Thanks very much. Posted by: Max at October 21, AM. Posted by: Joe at October 22, AM. Perkel, you rock. Hi Marc, Here's a good place to get the codec for the avi file without any hassle. Posted by: v at October 23, AM. F is here Why dont you use Torrent instead, It will save you a lot of bandwidth.
Posted by: ceejay at October 27, AM. Good work sir! I've added a link to you on my site to help spread the word. Posted by: Silversow at October 27, AM. Posted by: Wayne at October 31, AM. Greetings from Argentina. Posted by: Gav at October 31, PM. Posted by: Kristine at October 31, PM.
I've already seen the movie, but I wanted to note that I think you're doing a wonderful thing. Now, that's not very nice, Mr. George W. Bush flipping the bird as if to say "Hey World: f you guys!
From here on, there is no stopping for breath. We observe the flight of Saudi aristocrats who, but for their political connections, might have been held as material witnesses.
Moore depicts vividly the links between the Bush family and their Saudi friends, one of whom Prince Bandar 'earns' the Bush surname.
On it goes, fact after fact after irrefutable and disgusting fact. Many of us entered the theatre thinking we knew the score, but seldom has an overview of each tree led to such a complete vision of the forest. Along the way, we'll see behavior from members of the bush administration that cannot be described as flattering -- but once again, this isn't up for debate.
It's the facts, it's what they themselves said. You can argue context, but the footage speaks for itself. And more than anything else, this is where Michael Moore proves he's grown as a director. No longer are his films chock-full of his narrative, he lets the evildoers hoist themselves on their own petards without as much overdubbed commentary. His statement rests in the overall structure of the film, rather than his usual assortment of shame-defying pecadillos and exposes. Which is not to say that fans of his spirited antics won't have something to watch, as he drives around the capital building in an ice cream truck reading the Patriot act to the representatives who never bothered to read the legislation they passed, or chases after congressmen trying to get them interested in enlisting their children for a tour of duty in Iraq.
Aaah, Iraq. The second half of the film deals with the buildup to and execution of our current adventure in nation building. Iraq is shown with a brief clip from before and a whole lot of after -- with its people confused, hurting, seeking their loved ones in the rubble. Our soldiers are also given plenty of time on-screen, time to describe what it's like, time to proclaim the thrills, dangers, and ennui of life as an occupying army.
Far from being unsupportive as claimed by its detractors, this film makes every effort to give the front-liners their say. Wounded soldiers are treated with no less compassion than the other victims in this film. And unlike the corporate newsmedia, Moore's cameras dare to follow the injured to the Walter Reed medical center and into their underfunded rehabilitation. And it follows the heart of a patriotic woman from Moore's hometown of Flint whose soldier son makes the ultimate sacrifice for Bush's folly.
This is, above all, a sympathetic, patriotic and humanistic movie. Even its main star, George W. Bush, is given a measure of understanding. We understand that he is out of his league, unable to push for the appropriate diplomatic solutions with Saudi Arabia, forever beholden to the corporate interests that purchased his throne, barely capable of coherent thought, and not at all comfortable with the responsibilities of the presidency.
He would far rather be golfing, or 'lookin' for bugs', or hanging at fundraisers with 'the haves and the have-mores'; the presidency is a burden he clearly cannot bear. He almost begs to be removed from office. This movie has a lot more to say than any reviewer's encapsulation can convey.
Ignore the naysayers who, in all likelihood, haven't even seen the film. Understand that the facts are the facts, the presentation is Mr.
Moore's, and your opinion is your own. Let's admit it, it's nearly impossible to find someone or something today without a bias towards one thing or another.
I saw this film very recently and was stunned. Michael Moore's work was thorough, concise, and extraordinary. I was truly impressed. However, there are things that the public needs to consider after seeing this movie. One- this is not the whole story. Unfortunately, I don't know the whole story. Go figure. And two- in order to migrate further from possibly getting tunnel vision, we need to look at and seriously consider the other side.
If all of them are valid, I see no justification for the lies and corruption. But again, this perspective is not the only one and therefor other views should be considered and digested. Am I wrong? Moore's film strips away the pseudo patriotic facade of the Bush administration with humor and tragedy to create a very compelling but flawed message: Bush used false pretenses to go to war while enriching his friends and letting the common people suffer the fallout. The film moves between powerfully tragic scenes like the sound of planes flying into the Towers as the screen is blacked out to interviewing a dead soldier's mom to parody Bush and Cheney dressed like cowboys in a scene with Bonanza music in the background.
Moore raises several provocative questions such as why did Bush sit for seven minutes in an elementary classroom without reacting? Moore suggests answers which imply Bush didn't know what to do. Moore raises questions and suggests answers which right wing critics find abhorrent. His film techniques of showing a triumphant, strutting Bush proclaiming major military operations are over and quickly cutting to a roadside bomb in Iraq exploding, showing Bush as either ignorant, stupid, or mendacious were very powerful.
Moore's weakness was in trying to give his audience too many messages in a single film but he comes very close to succeeding. His success was apparent to many right wing radio hosts, who immediately declared him both a liar and antiamerican or America hating. But not in any nutso, radical activist kind of way.
I love my country. I couldn't imagine living anywhere else. But I, like Michael and many others, can't just bow our heads and be good little robots of society.
We seek change. Not in a bad, violent revolutionary way, but done democratically through the people. Through all the criticism and backlash this film has recieved, one simple idea was grossly overlooked.
All the haters out there are accusing his film of being overly one-sided, well guess what folks, in case you didn't notice those precious television news reports we sit through every night while we munch away at our dinners is INSANELY one-sided and biased in every way, shape and form. There has never been a film, documentary or not, that has directly attacked our active President.
Michael Moore is not some cook radical spewing unsubstantiated accusations through a Hitler-esque propaganda film as its been called. If Moore's agenda had simply been to 'dethrone Bush at all costs', then he could have left out a good fifty percent of the film and focused primarily on the man everyone is convinced he loves to hate.
He is very simply offering us a 'second opinion' if you will, on all the news media that has bombarded us since September 11th. He is simply exercising his freedom of speech to the tenth degree and THAT is what I love about this country. If this film was made in any other country about their leader, they would be jailed, beaten, and maybe even killed.
And he has tapped into a very important thing about our society. And guess what, lower and middle-class people go to the movies the most. People who don't normally vote go to the movies.
People who have no idea who Michael Moore is will go see this movie. You remember the youth of our country right? The apathetic, non-political group of 18 to 20 year-olds that were always ignored by politicians? Not that this film has turned them all into a bunch of Bush-haters, but it HAS gotten them involved.
What no person or institution has been able to do for the longest time has been accomplished by one little documentary. As I sat there in the movie theater, with the end credits coming on screen and the house lights shining brightly down. I saw something that I have never seen in my life.
I looked around the packed theater on a Monday night and witnessed all different kinds of people, old and young, Black and White, applauding and cheering out of their seats. The hair stood up on the back of my head and a tear came to my eye.
I was totally blown away by what I was seeing. Please, you owe it to yourself to see this movie with an open-mind and a thirst for not the truth, but a 'second opinion'.
Fahrenheit was a book about a society that burned books in order to censor them from the people. You be the judge. My partner and I went with four friends on opening weekend, ages 19 to 56, and we all had tearful moments in between the many laughs and guffaws. One of our friends, who has never voted in the 6 years since he turned 18, has now been moved to become more involved in the political process.
This film is not just about 'Bush is Bad' but really looks at how the tendrils of big business can, and do, shape the direction our government takes, and where the current administration has gone off track. Be prepared for a few grisly war scenes, but remember, it's nothing compared to what our men and women there have to deal with. Whether you like Micheal Moore or not, you should give this film the opportunity to move you! The audience was completely in tune with what Michael Moore was trying to do.
When he wanted you to be mad, people were mad. When he wanted you to be upset, people were upset, and when he wanted you laugh, people laughed. And boy, did they laugh. The audience cheered loudly upon the film's conclusion.
Truly a satisfying moment, to feel part of a community of people, if only for two hours, who recognized that the emperor indeed has no clothes. Is Michael Moore manipulative? Of course- he's an editorial documentarian. Does he sometimes assume too much from too little information? Of course- he's a human being. That's what human beings do.
Now, you may say, yes, it may be human nature to infer too much from too little information, but as a responsible artist, Michael Moore should get his ducks firmly in a row before trying to manipulate his audience. That being said, we have libel in slander laws in this country. If Michael Moore is so far off base, where are the lawsuits and defamation of character charges?
Why is that, in fact, they state an unwillingness even to see the film, and yet feel qualified to have a valid opinion of it? Now who's inferring too much from too little? Any attempt to dissect Michael Moore's arguments fall flat when these basic facts are irrefutable. Bush, embarrassment to himself, our great nation, and, for that matter, to the entire human race. Please help vote this buffoon out of office before he can discredit our country further. The problem with this film is that Moore's style is built on visceral reactions rather than carefully crafted argument.
The resulting disorganized rant may be enjoyable for those who already share his views, but it is unlikely to impress anyone else. Even those who agree with him on many issues I, for one, do may find some of his assertions hard to swallow.
The most bizarre claims he has made, though, are thankfully absent from the film. For instance, anyone who reads his book 'Dude, Where's My Country?
How could a guy sitting in a cave in Afghanistan, hooked up to dialysis, have directed and overseen the actions of nineteen terrorists for two years in the United States and then plotted so perfectly the hijacking of four planes and then guaranteed that three of them would end up precisely on their targets?
How did he organize, communicate, control and supervise this kind of massive attack? With two cans and a string? But any doubts he may still harbor on this matter are not presented in the film. All he does is briefly mention that 'Bin Laden was a Saudi' to back up his claim that our real enemy is Saudi Arabia, not Iraq. Moore does deserve credit for calling attention to the now-famous clip showing the President remaining in a kindergarten classroom for seven minutes after having been informed that the country was under attack.
It would have made sense for Bush to cut the session short, especially since we now know that the Pentagon had not yet been struck and a fourth hijacked plane was on the loose. The footage gives the impression that Bush wasn't sure how to act on his own, without the guidance of his advisers. Unfortunately, Moore's portrayal of other events is not quite so defensible. In his depiction of the post-election controversy, for example, he shows Jeffrey Toobin asserting that a statewide recount in Florida would have shown Gore to be the winner 'under every scenario.
See Toobin's book 'Too Close to Call,' pp. This highlights why some have called the film one-sided. It's one thing to express a viewpoint, it's quite another to ignore contrary evidence. The problem thus may be more in what the film doesn't show than in what it shows. Take the famous scene where Moore confronts Congressmen and encourages them to enlist their sons and daughters.
We see some getting flustered by the proposal, others refusing even to speak with Moore, who then assures us that not a single Congressman took up his offer. What we do not see is one who answers Moore eloquently, but it is entirely possible that at least one of them did. That's the problem: every single shot of the film is designed to make his targets look as ridiculous as possible, and he doesn't include footage that fails to serve that purpose.
The film has just too much calculation to be believed. This becomes particularly important when he shows a woman whose son died in Iraq, and who stopped supporting Bush because of it. We watch her become indignant, and then hysterical, after a passerby asserts that her grief is staged. The trouble is that the sequence does feel staged, not because the story was faked I'll assume Moore wouldn't go that far , but because Moore probably looked into many personal accounts before he found exactly what he needed to make his point.
I'm sure that not everyone who has lost a loved one in this war has blamed the President. We are also treated to graphic images of soldiers with debilitating wounds, of civilian casualties in Iraq, of Iraqi women cursing America for the destruction brought upon their families.
0コメント